Would you like to improve the quality of your lottery predictions? Would you like more correct numbers in your play list? Of course you would. Who wouldn’t?
Everyone wants to improve their lottery predictions. And, yet millions of players are still not using a lottery software program to improve their chances of winning the lottery. Now doesn’t it seem to be a bit contradictory that in a day and age when computers can analyze the most complex and challenging problems of our time, that some people still cling to their belief that using a lottery software program to analyze their lottery is a silly waste of time. Who’s really being silly here?
I started using computers to analyze lotteries over 25 years ago and, even then, uncovering previously unheard of lottery number patterns and trends was common place. And, unless they are the world’s most successful recluse, it shouldn’t surprise anyone that today’s software is significantly better.
There was a time when lottery predictions techniques were kept secret and shrouded in mystery. That is less so today. Recently, many lottery experts have been togel hongkong lifting the veil, so to speak. So, would you like to know the name of the most powerful lottery prediction algorithm ever devised? It is called Cycles. I know this because I developed the technique and named it.
The Cycles method of analysis is revolutionary because it is not interested in the performance of lottery numbers. Instead, it focuses on where lottery numbers come from; where should the lottery player look for them in the lotteries history. Cycles outperform the randomly selecting lottery numbers by a wide margin.
Here is how to compare the Cycles method to the method of Randomly Selecting Numbers (better known as guessing).
1. Randomly select a list of numbers to play in the next drawing.
2. Continue doing this for 100 drawings. ( Or 200, or 300… )
3. In the same manner, have Cycles select a similarly sized list.
4. Cycles will successfully and consistently predict anywhere from 15% to 35% more winning numbers than Random Selecting Numbers.
In spite of overwhelming evidence, skeptics continue to cry that this isn’t possible because the lottery is a random game of chance. They declare that this must be a fluke; a onetime thing. But, they refuse to look at the numbers. And, the numbers don’t lie.